BESSON-DEBLON, Pierre (SOGETI HIGH TECH)
16 years ago
Hello,
We use sequoia with 2 controllers on RAIDb1, sequoia is 2.10.9 with jgroups.
We experienced this weird behavior :
# on controller 1 (c1) backend deactivated, on c2 backend activated
c2.log -> 29 Apr 2009 12:56:12,400 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Database backend db2 is now enabled
# c1 receive a read request and forward to c2
c1.log ->
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,271 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.request.db | S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,273 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db |Sending request SELECT ... to Member c2
c2.log ->
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,353 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,355 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | 172.20.1.81:65209: Scheduling distributedRequest 844424930131983 from Member c1
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,355 | sequoia.controller.distributedvirtualdatabase.request.db | S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,356 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | handleMessageMultiThreaded (class org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.protocol.ExecRemoteStatementExecuteQuery): S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,356 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | 172.20.1.81:65209: Executing distributedRequest 844424930131983 from Member c1
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,356 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Database schema is dirty, refreshing it
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,359 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Scheduling read Request (844424930131983): SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,359 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Load balancing read request (844424930131983): SELECT ...
and right after in c2.log file
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,268 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.db | StatementExecuteQuery command
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,268 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.request.db | S 562949953430692 0 SELECT ...
c1.log
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,233 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Request SELECT ... completed.
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,234 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | An error occured while executing remote select request 844424930131983
org.continuent.sequoia.common.exceptions.NoMoreBackendException
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.requestmanager.distributed.RAIDb1DistributedRequestManager.execRemoteStatementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.requestmanager.distributed.DistributedRequestManager.statementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabase.statementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.statementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.run(Unknown Source)
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,234 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | Request '844424930131983' failed (null)
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,234 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.db | Error during command execution (null)
So, How can request fail with NoMoreBackendException despite db2 on c2 is enabled ?
Is it normal to have no more log in c2.log to indicate Exception ?, is it possible that request is hanging on c2 and a timeout raise the exception ?
Thanks for any help.
Pierre Besson-Deblon
The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other then the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail.
Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately.
All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.
We use sequoia with 2 controllers on RAIDb1, sequoia is 2.10.9 with jgroups.
We experienced this weird behavior :
# on controller 1 (c1) backend deactivated, on c2 backend activated
c2.log -> 29 Apr 2009 12:56:12,400 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Database backend db2 is now enabled
# c1 receive a read request and forward to c2
c1.log ->
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,271 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.request.db | S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,273 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db |Sending request SELECT ... to Member c2
c2.log ->
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,353 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,355 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | 172.20.1.81:65209: Scheduling distributedRequest 844424930131983 from Member c1
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,355 | sequoia.controller.distributedvirtualdatabase.request.db | S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,356 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | handleMessageMultiThreaded (class org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.protocol.ExecRemoteStatementExecuteQuery): S 844424930131983 0 SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,356 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | 172.20.1.81:65209: Executing distributedRequest 844424930131983 from Member c1
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,356 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Database schema is dirty, refreshing it
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,359 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Scheduling read Request (844424930131983): SELECT ...
29 Apr 2009 12:56:16,359 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Load balancing read request (844424930131983): SELECT ...
and right after in c2.log file
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,268 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.db | StatementExecuteQuery command
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,268 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.request.db | S 562949953430692 0 SELECT ...
c1.log
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,233 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | Request SELECT ... completed.
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,234 | sequoia.controller.RequestManager.db | An error occured while executing remote select request 844424930131983
org.continuent.sequoia.common.exceptions.NoMoreBackendException
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.requestmanager.distributed.RAIDb1DistributedRequestManager.execRemoteStatementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.requestmanager.distributed.DistributedRequestManager.statementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabase.statementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.statementExecuteQuery(Unknown Source)
at org.continuent.sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.run(Unknown Source)
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,234 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.db | Request '844424930131983' failed (null)
29 Apr 2009 12:56:21,234 | sequoia.controller.virtualdatabase.VirtualDatabaseWorkerThread.db | Error during command execution (null)
So, How can request fail with NoMoreBackendException despite db2 on c2 is enabled ?
Is it normal to have no more log in c2.log to indicate Exception ?, is it possible that request is hanging on c2 and a timeout raise the exception ?
Thanks for any help.
Pierre Besson-Deblon
The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other then the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail.
Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately.
All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.